In post The TMP? opportunity to make money we reported the doubts and concerns to the provincial territory, Francesco Mazzoli, related to the possibility Municipalities that use the urban contracted for " make money." Given that the PGT Passirano instead of talking about "urban contracted" we resort to a more reassuring definition, that of "negotiated planning - certainly more elegant and refined, but absolutely the same in substance - we see now understand the state of the art works of one of the PGT Passirano identifies as a priority. This is the school campus, a smash that is worth addressing for analyze some of these issues.
start with the document financial viability (page 271) of the PGT, noting that ".. . 1981 to 2006 youngsters aged 0-14 has increased from 1,075 to 1,034, a drop of 41 "children-boys," representing a decrease of 3.8%. " The obvious consideration is that in the 15 years under review there has been no increase in the school population, but on the contrary, the number of children -girlfriend is actually decreased. careful, because this trend is very hard may change over time. To say we are not, but once again the financial sustainability of the document PGT: ... Passirano seems to confirm as a country tend deprived of young people, families or couples with children, too unbalanced and the single population elderly. more clearly than that ...
second aspect, far from irrelevant. The idea of \u200b\u200bexpensive school campus is over straight in the Plan of Government of the Territory, total absence of external stakeholders . disappeared from the scene citizens, parents, teachers, pupils, the Council of the Institute, Centre School, Tips of Directors of the Foundations of preschools, again, as in many other occasions, on stage, to take care of school buildings, were the usual suspects. The result? At the moment it seems in line with that achieved in recent years.
Yeah, but what happened? For the benefit of taxpayers Passirano let's summarize it briefly. In 2000 he inaugurated the new middle school, the intervention cost several billion lire that, so he was told, would have done at an appropriate level and ultimately to the needs of school buildings. In 2005, this same administration spends 650,000 other € for school lunches and some new classrooms in primary school Passirano. Viewed the PGT Passirano is in gestation for at least 2-3 years, it follows that while working hard to restructure elementary school (2005), someone is already working on programs and projects for the new school campus. How shall we define? Everything except vision.
Two questions before proceeding. Why every 3-4 years Passirano regularly returns to the fore the issue of school? And 'we expect that such interventions are designed to last at least 20 years, as happens elsewhere?
Some well-informed claims, however, that the real problem was not lack of programmazion and , but the lack of readily available volumes to address educational needs that would have occurred without prior notice (?). A theory to be proved, not so much for the unpredictability of growth in school population (denied by the same PGT), but for the alleged lack of public buildings. Because if this were the real reason for the dispute, the old town hall, and the building would not be ex-SIA were razed to the ground, but would have been much more wisely recovered to be used as a public service to new destinations. Especially since those two properties were located in the center of the country!
said that the Plan of Services, under school campus, provides a cost of only € 1,000,000 for the acquisition of the first batch (!) the school campus could be a really false p ROBLEMS. A legitimate doubt, because there are too many unclear aspects of this catchphrase: decrease in school population, total rejection by the administration to credit partners in building worthy of the name planning deficit that caused repeated and costly buffer, final demolition of public buildings that could be recovered for any need school construction. There's enough to rethink the whole operation school campus, especially since they are not prosperous times cash flow. Indeed ...
start with the document financial viability (page 271) of the PGT, noting that ".. . 1981 to 2006 youngsters aged 0-14 has increased from 1,075 to 1,034, a drop of 41 "children-boys," representing a decrease of 3.8%. " The obvious consideration is that in the 15 years under review there has been no increase in the school population, but on the contrary, the number of children -girlfriend is actually decreased. careful, because this trend is very hard may change over time. To say we are not, but once again the financial sustainability of the document PGT: ... Passirano seems to confirm as a country tend deprived of young people, families or couples with children, too unbalanced and the single population elderly. more clearly than that ...
second aspect, far from irrelevant. The idea of \u200b\u200bexpensive school campus is over straight in the Plan of Government of the Territory, total absence of external stakeholders . disappeared from the scene citizens, parents, teachers, pupils, the Council of the Institute, Centre School, Tips of Directors of the Foundations of preschools, again, as in many other occasions, on stage, to take care of school buildings, were the usual suspects. The result? At the moment it seems in line with that achieved in recent years.
Yeah, but what happened? For the benefit of taxpayers Passirano let's summarize it briefly. In 2000 he inaugurated the new middle school, the intervention cost several billion lire that, so he was told, would have done at an appropriate level and ultimately to the needs of school buildings. In 2005, this same administration spends 650,000 other € for school lunches and some new classrooms in primary school Passirano. Viewed the PGT Passirano is in gestation for at least 2-3 years, it follows that while working hard to restructure elementary school (2005), someone is already working on programs and projects for the new school campus. How shall we define? Everything except vision.
Two questions before proceeding. Why every 3-4 years Passirano regularly returns to the fore the issue of school? And 'we expect that such interventions are designed to last at least 20 years, as happens elsewhere?
Some well-informed claims, however, that the real problem was not lack of programmazion and , but the lack of readily available volumes to address educational needs that would have occurred without prior notice (?). A theory to be proved, not so much for the unpredictability of growth in school population (denied by the same PGT), but for the alleged lack of public buildings. Because if this were the real reason for the dispute, the old town hall, and the building would not be ex-SIA were razed to the ground, but would have been much more wisely recovered to be used as a public service to new destinations. Especially since those two properties were located in the center of the country!
said that the Plan of Services, under school campus, provides a cost of only € 1,000,000 for the acquisition of the first batch (!) the school campus could be a really false p ROBLEMS. A legitimate doubt, because there are too many unclear aspects of this catchphrase: decrease in school population, total rejection by the administration to credit partners in building worthy of the name planning deficit that caused repeated and costly buffer, final demolition of public buildings that could be recovered for any need school construction. There's enough to rethink the whole operation school campus, especially since they are not prosperous times cash flow. Indeed ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment