"Even in the history of other peoples, writes Fülöp-Miller, revolutions have led to brutal measures of violence, but what first seemed an absurd contradiction, and was considered a betrayal and a denial of 'idea of \u200b\u200bfreedom in Russia was passed off as a new truth, a fundamental discovery ... In the past, those states, those classes or groups who pursue their goals had used the brutal violence, had to tremble before the moral judgments of mankind, but the Bolsheviks profess a creed of terror and they took it as a starting point of their doctrine of salvation and their ethics.
The celebrated 'practical reason', of which the Bolsheviks boast of being the only discoverers, led to the conclusion that the happiness of mankind can be achieved not fighting for moral freedom, but through an improvement introduced by coercion in material conditions of life: the freedom of individual conscience, the choice between good and evil, harmful and even dangerous to the happiness of the masses, the only way to achieve happiness consists in blind obedience. "
"The moral judgments of human destiny and lost its absolute morality became a value of 'dialectic' on the principles of which were entirely dictated by class interests of the moment. "
"Involuntarily my mind sets up a confrontation between the Bolshevik interpretation of ethics and morality and spiritual tendencies of Jesuitism. Dostoyevsky, the great seer, in his 'Legend of the Grand Inquisitor' which now seems prophetic, he intuitively looked and played the identity between the Russian socialism, the archetype of Bolshevism, and Jesuit ideas ... The notebooks of Dostoyevsky confirm that he saw in the Jesuit and socialism in the same 'spirit of liberation by means of despotism and forced happiness of mankind'. "
"Man So if he wants to be happy in accordance with the Bolshevik conception, should not obey the truth of their inner consciousness, but at the controls of authorities, which claim to be able to weigh objectively as more prudent, what is better and more useful to the community ".
Dostoevsky concludes Fülöp-Miller, the company had foreshadowed perfectly Bolshevik. In the novel 'Demons' (1871), a character says is good "the idea of \u200b\u200bespionage, according to which each member supervises the other and has a duty to report them when necessary. All are slaves and equal in their slavery ... First of all, it changes the level of culture, science and natural talent ... We do not need more than talent ... The men of talent can not help but become despots, so it is good to drive them or execute them. "
fact that Bolshevism was the dictatorship of mediocrity.
"Culture is not necessary [again I quote from 'The Demons']... Every thirst for culture is already a noble impulse, add it to the family and love, and you have the desire of the property. We will destroy this desire, and promote an incredible demoralization, murdered a child genius. Everything will be reduced to a common denominator, will be implemented exactly the same. "
The celebrated 'practical reason', of which the Bolsheviks boast of being the only discoverers, led to the conclusion that the happiness of mankind can be achieved not fighting for moral freedom, but through an improvement introduced by coercion in material conditions of life: the freedom of individual conscience, the choice between good and evil, harmful and even dangerous to the happiness of the masses, the only way to achieve happiness consists in blind obedience. "
"The moral judgments of human destiny and lost its absolute morality became a value of 'dialectic' on the principles of which were entirely dictated by class interests of the moment. "
"Involuntarily my mind sets up a confrontation between the Bolshevik interpretation of ethics and morality and spiritual tendencies of Jesuitism. Dostoyevsky, the great seer, in his 'Legend of the Grand Inquisitor' which now seems prophetic, he intuitively looked and played the identity between the Russian socialism, the archetype of Bolshevism, and Jesuit ideas ... The notebooks of Dostoyevsky confirm that he saw in the Jesuit and socialism in the same 'spirit of liberation by means of despotism and forced happiness of mankind'. "
"Man So if he wants to be happy in accordance with the Bolshevik conception, should not obey the truth of their inner consciousness, but at the controls of authorities, which claim to be able to weigh objectively as more prudent, what is better and more useful to the community ".
Dostoevsky concludes Fülöp-Miller, the company had foreshadowed perfectly Bolshevik. In the novel 'Demons' (1871), a character says is good "the idea of \u200b\u200bespionage, according to which each member supervises the other and has a duty to report them when necessary. All are slaves and equal in their slavery ... First of all, it changes the level of culture, science and natural talent ... We do not need more than talent ... The men of talent can not help but become despots, so it is good to drive them or execute them. "
fact that Bolshevism was the dictatorship of mediocrity.
"Culture is not necessary [again I quote from 'The Demons']... Every thirst for culture is already a noble impulse, add it to the family and love, and you have the desire of the property. We will destroy this desire, and promote an incredible demoralization, murdered a child genius. Everything will be reduced to a common denominator, will be implemented exactly the same. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment