Saturday, March 12, 2011

How Do I Get My Dogs Hair To Grow Back

Bolshevism. Mass-man. Demons by Dostoevsky. René Fülöp-Miller: The face of Bolshevism. Milan, V. Bompiani, 1932. (2nd part)












Many of the pre-revolutionary Bolshevik leaders who were deported to Siberia by the Tsarist police, often managed to escape, even more than once, from their prisons. Sign that the surveillance was not so close. And 'anyone ever managed to escape from the Soviet gulag? The only episode that comes to mind is this, as told by Evfrosinija Kersnovskaja in his book 'How much is a man'. Two deportees fled, taking with him, with the allurements, a chubby fellow who still want to eat to survive. The ferocity of this inhuman act I think that it can represent well the hellish conditions of the gulag.
The deportation at the time of the czars was not anywhere near as fierce as the Soviet prison camps. Here the prisoners were working in inhumane conditions until they are exhausted and death. Dostoevsky, as told in 'Memoirs of a House of the Dead' her experience of exile from 1849 to 1853, writes that prisoners, in addition to forced labor, all had a personal work, without which they could not survive. The personal work was not prohibited in prison, but the tools were strictly prohibited. However, close one eye. "Frequently, prisoners who did not know any profession, but were not slow to learn from someone mates, so that his sentence, came out of good craftsmen. There were shoemakers, tailors, carpenters, blacksmiths, engravers and decorators. "
Solženicyin Alexander wrote that Bolshevism has changed the character of the Russian people, destroying its natural goodness and piety of heart. The French writer Xavier de Maistre ( 1763-1852), who spent many years in Russia, where he became even army general, told in the novel 'The young Siberian' a true story. A girl of fifteen, Prascovia Lopulov, always lived with their parents into exile, for affection branch supported by a great faith, he left to go from Siberia to St. Petersburg to talk with the Tsar and secure the release of his father. The trip lasted a few years. Only the kindness of the people I met allowed the girl to get to Petersburg, where she, 'the ease of innocence', he managed to come up to the emperor.
When parents, after having secured the release, they met for the first time his daughter, 'fell on his knees before her'. What is left of the popular piety? Would it be possible to imagine a trip like that in Soviet Russia? Even Dostoevsky points out that, among the various sources of income in prison (smuggling, jobs tailor, barber, of a violin player, etc..), There was alms. "The privileged classes have absolutely no idea of \u200b\u200bwhat care prodighino merchants, the petty bourgeoisie and the entire populace to unfortunate [so people were called by the convicts]."
Fülöp-Miller, although it has not yet seen the worst of the thirties, already can be said that 'justice' Bolshevik is far worse than the Tsarist. "As the judicial procedure was inadequate under the old regime, there was still a procedure with the taking of evidence, indictment, witness interviews and speeches of defense officials Bolsheviks but were exempted from all these formalities, establish a kingdom of arbitrariness which the world had not seen for centuries. So the new boss of Russia, 'mass-man', came to bring freedom to the land, he learned quickly to use the media and the arts of tyranny better than the cruelest among the Tsar. "
(continued)

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Wish You Well Book Chapter Summary

Bolshevism. Mass-man. The Demons of Fyodor Dostoevsky. René Fülöp-Miller: The face of Bolshevism. Milan, V. Bompiani, 1932. (1st part)













the market of the things used to be held in Scandicci the last Sunday of each month, there was a few weeks ago, a young man who exhibited inside an old suitcase full of fiber, a score of old books.
"Where are these books?" I asked.
"belonged to the uncle of my girlfriend, who was treated at the Fifth High." I feel sorry
for those books to the suitcase and the old priest. The book I bought it willingly, if the claim was more modest, this is the "Face of Bolshevism." As far as I can remember, I had never seen the author mentioned in any history book or had never heard of.
But since the book attracted me, I borrowed the copy held by the National Library (library wonderful, where you can find every fragment - or most - of the past). Austrian
The first edition of "The Face of Bolshevism" (Geist und Gesicht des Bolschewismus) is 1926. The author was only 35 years, but his judgments are sharp and weighted and the following decades have been unable to confirm the value. Stalinism in 1925-26 had not yet established and Stalin never even mentioned by Fülöp-Miller (also because the book is just a cultural report). However, the framework that the author describes fatal proves them wrong especially those who complain that the horror of the Stalinist gulag and the catastrophe of the Soviet Union.
The evil was the root.
"Today the impersonal mass is the master of Russia, is the most important new phenomenon that Bolshevism has produced ... Those who believe in the revolution announced by ecstatic rapture that being sinister [mass] will be the great work of the century, the 'new man', the creature of the future that will replace the individual and will rule in his place ... The individual against the mass moves with effortless superiority, because it has the force multiplied by the organization ... This is the only release possible: the evolution of the soul can not lead humanity to a real rebirth, salvation is attainable only with the mechanics union, extrinsic, only additional half of all individuals to the organization . Only external functions that are common to millions of people, movements and contemporary congeners can be connected in many more high units, gears, advanced simultaneous cheers shouted by the masses, choral singing of joy, beatings collective opponent, here are the manifestations of life from which man must leave the top of the new type. But all that separates us from each other, which represents the meaning of individual men, so first of all the soul, is an obstacle to this development and should consequently be deleted. The inner man must be replaced by 'magnificent outer man', the soul must be redeemed by the organization. Since only what he is mechanically organized reality, power, duration, only the mechanical device is reliable, with only 'collective man' released from the hurt of the soul and joint mechanism outside interests to the other, is strong. To him alone belongs the kingdom of the future. "
"So many believers of Bolshevism have sacrificed their souls to the new idol unknown, the mass-man, and just adding another sacrifice of the abolition of private property, you can get a feel horrible that harakiri Russia has had to undergo in the man of the past ... In a world that Russia is rising, with no personal joy for life, with no color pictures, music without harmony, a philosophical system without the support of the inner spirit, a world in which there will only be mechanized soulless machines. With the aggravation of the fanatics, the Bolsheviks condemned all those who want to introduce by stealth a 'psyche' collective in mechanical engineering in humans to depose him in right now the seeds of decay to which it reduces at the bottom of each kind of psyche ".
Fülöp-Miller browse, with very interesting considerations, although the level of journalism, literature, theater, music, architecture, religion and other important aspects of the new Russian life, and concludes his book on a chapter to katorga (forced labor) and one, fundamental ethics of Bolshevism.
(continued)

Saturday, March 5, 2011

Reducing Hcg After Miscarriage

_____P.PP____ "answer" to Pier Paolo Pasolini (02/11/2006)



I asked myself many times why I ... who are always contrary commemorations, exploitation and manipulation, and never, ever, I queued for several other gifts in memory of a great character a lot less of PPP, I have found instead to participate in both 2006 and in 2010 two exhibitions about him. Although it cost me not just decide this, now I do not regret. In fact, an intellectual of his caliber I especially admire the intelligence and the ability to discern, his intuition and his feeling that I'm sure it was far from the susceptibility that dwells in the minds of many. These noble qualities even more skill in some field, and their own culture, quite remarkable in him. The latter fact although they are important qualities I was never particularly impressed because potentially cultivable by anyone. Let's say it was an honor for me to have these two events of Cagliari and Bologna in any way the possibility of "meeting".



_____P.PP____ "answer" to Pier Paolo Pasolini
02/11/2006

'It therefore absolutely necessary to die, because we are alive as long as we fail to sense, and the language of our lives (which we express ourselves, and to which dunqe ... u attach the highest importance) is untranslatable: a chaos of possibilities, a search for meanings of relationships and seamless. Death makes an instantaneous montage of our lives: that chooses his moments really meaningful (and now no longer editable by other possible moments against or inconsistency) and puts them in succession, making our present, infinite, unstable and uncertain, and therefore not be described linguistically, past a clear, stable, reliable, and therefore be described linguistically (in fact a "general semiotics"). Only through the death, our life we \u200b\u200bneed to express ourselves "
PierPaoloPasolini, "Empiricism heretical"



Dear PPP ,

November 2 reminds us that the death of an intellectual seems willed by fate, built by his understanding,
in your case, the myth-metaphor for the crucifixion of the soul like someone who hangs a nail its faceless portrait on which passes over the body-blood , life-device lived a humble innocent deception.
A chip-chip of all this, with all crahh-crahh of guide from your film, I see your "beyond."

Leaving rolling of Pen Pen brush in Brush of P in P Painting and Poetry in P'Arte your flag tireless , now reduced to shreds , your soul already led the massacre.

"Someone will take my flag ..." _ wrote.
contradictions between torn and passing frames on the heart / chest your screen, the best, re- cineprende
still today a day to protect a species not extinct at all, that your flag was dedicated
"becomes again the poorest rag and wave O'er thee ..." _dicevi.
Now here's your re-rag to a metaphor I that sees beyond the "your".
compared to those of the flag has always seen and still sees only its color, red-twisted beyond reason , its convenient to hold their own convenience, you will have saw "their freedom" their anger-love always misunderstood his own anger- to drive them away [those usual merchants. ..] organized have your "own" demise.
And so, as you know, win time what is still down here as their freedom still has groped.




DIOYDEA @ 2006



____________